Its primary sources, along with commentaries by Charvaka scholars is missing or lost. Our knowledge of Indian materialism is chiefly based on these.' Controversy on reliability of sources, pp. 10, 29–32 states that the claims against Charvaka of, lack of any morality and ethics and disregard for spirituality is from texts of competing religious philosophies (Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism). But almost every work of the other schools states, for refutation, the materialistic views. Chatterjee and Datta explain that our understanding of Charvaka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of its ideas by other schools, and that it is not a living tradition: 'Though materialism in some form or other has always been present in India, and occasional references are found in the Vedas, the Buddhistic literature, the Epics, as well as in the later philosophical works we do not find any systematic work on materialism, nor any organised school of followers as the other philosophical schools possess. Whatever is written on Charvaka post this is based on second-hand knowledge, learned from preceptors to disciples and no independent works on Charvaka philosophy can be found. Main article: There was no continuity in the Charvaka tradition after the 12th century.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |